|
Reading requirement nixed!
Outpouring of member protests sinks proposed class
 |
Mat-Su EA President George Stuart (left) speaks
in opposition to the Alaska Reading course. He was testifying
in person before the Alaska State Board of Education. From the
state capital Juneau EA Past President Richard Steele (below)testified
on behalf of JEA against the proposed Alaska Reading Course. His
and other associations' testimony helped send the measure back
to the drawing board |
|
A firestorm of
opposition from educators across Alaska caused the Alaska State
Board of Education to back off and rethink a controversial new
reading requirement put forward last summer by the Alaska Dept.
of Education and Early Development (DEED). At its December
meeting, the State Board did not take a formal vote on the
proposal. Instead, the Board directed DEED to continue working
on the topic of improving student reading skills—in
collaboration with Alaska educators and literacy experts.
“This is a
major win for our members,” said NEA-Alaska President Bill
Bjork, “and for the children of Alaska. Mandating the Alaska
Reading class would have simply added another barrier to
attracting quality teachers to Alaska—and keeping them here.” |

(Photo by Patty George) |
The proposal would have required that, beginning next year, teachers
pass the three-credit course as a pre-requisite for recertification.
New teachers would have had to take it before they could earn a
professional license.
“In the first place, the pedagogy of the course was suspect,” said
Bjork. “Everyone from kindergarten to calculus teachers would have had
to take the same class. It’s that one-size-fits-all approach that all
educators know doesn’t work.” The school boards of Anchorage,
Fairbanks, Juneau, Lower Kuskokwim, and Bering Strait came out in
opposition to the proposal, as did the Alaska State Literacy Association
and the Dept. of Teaching & Learning, College of Education, University
of Alaska Anchorage.
But the overwhelming number of protests came from teachers. The State
Board received more than 500 pages of written comments. Impassioned and
articulate, the e-mails poured in. Below are a few excerpts from those
protests, including one from a rural administrator:
-
“I teach a reading
class through UAA. I have a master’s degree as a reading specialist
and 17 years of teaching experience. I find the requirement rather
redundant.”
-
“Requiring a “one
size fits all” course would more likely end up being a ‘one size
fits none.’”
-
“Test scores in
reading are the least problematic in our district. Staff
development already addresses reading strategies, including as
recently as our October in-service. Fairbanks is very concerned
about recruiting and retaining teachers, and this new requirement
would be a deterrent to this mission.”
-
“This is simply
ridiculous—I AM a reading teacher. I do not need additional ‘doc in
the box’ shotgun ‘training.’”
-
“If the primary
area of need, according to all state tests, is mathematics, why are
we not then requiring a mathematics course?”
-
“Teachers’
professional development needs are best determined at the site
level, not the state.”
-
“The state keeps
adding more hoops to jump through, more expenses for the entry level
teacher, while at the same time reducing the security of retirement
programs and failing to maintain the competitive edge in salaries
that Alaska once had. Being an administrator in rural Alaska, I can
now offer a teacher a non-competitive salary, sub-standard housing,
sub-zero temperatures, $5 a gallon gasoline, very little sunshine
during the school year, and very high standards to get these
things. Has anybody been paying attention to the number of
applicants showing up for the ATP job fairs?”
After the Board’s decision not to move forward with the class as
proposed, Bjork said, “We applaud the State Board for its thoughtful
response on this issue. We stand ready to be part of the solution.
Teachers, above all others, know the critical importance of making sure
every Alaska child learns to read. Teachers are also lifelong learners
who value appropriate staff development.
“We will gladly work with the state on any new reading initiative that
is research based, appropriate for our members’ grade level and subject,
and meets the needs of the students.”
Statewide teacher training
mandate nixed
Story source:
Fairbanks Daily News Miner
By Robinson Duffy (Dec 8, 2007)
A proposal that would
have meant all teachers in Alaska would have to prove they
know how to teach reading was voted down by the Alaska State
Board of Education on Friday. |