Legislative House Candidate Questionnaire

Campaign 2006

 

Candidate:      Nancy Dahlstrom                                                      House District: 18

 

Candidate responses exceeding 30 words have been truncated.

 ADEQUATE FUNDING

 

1.  Presently three methods are recognized by experts and the courts as reliable means to determine adequate funding:  resource cost, best schools, and professional judgment.  Do you support the use of a recognized, research based study to determine the adequate funding level of K-12 schools?

            Yes

 

Explain:

Of course, if the resource costs more in Sutton than Anchorage for example, there should be a differential.

 

If you support an adequate funding study, how would you accomplish this?

a “true study” that addresses all -3-  models would achieve “actual” data.

 

2.  Do you support the use of area cost differential factors to provide equity in school funding?

            Yes

 

Rationale

It’s important to provide the same educational opportunities to children.

 

3.  The recent changes in funding for pupil transportation have had negative impacts in a number of school districts.  How would you address this issue?

In 2004, under a different fiscal climate we needed to restrict the growth of pupil transportation costs. This can be studied under the pupil model studies.

           

4.  Will you commit to working with NEA-Alaska and other groups in developing a long-range plan to supplement current funding levels and achieve adequate funding for schools within a decade?

            Yes

 

Rationale

I just worked hard for and voted for the largest increase in Alaska history.

 

5.  Would you support adequate funding of Alaska’s public schools to meet the constitutional mandate prior to funding of any other programs not constitutionally mandated?

            Yes

 

Rationale

Public ed. and public safety “are” the constitutional mandates.

 

LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PLAN

 

The 23rd and 24th Legislatures identified several revenue sources for consideration: alcohol tax, cruise ship tax, fuel tax, income tax, sales tax, and use of the Permanent Fund earnings.

 

Please list, in priority order, the sources you would utilize to create a long-range fiscal plan.

If the people of Alaska vote to spend P.F. earnings then I will do it.  Then already in place is the alcohol tax and fuel tax; fuel, cruise, sales then …

 

PERS/TRS

 

1.  What percentage of their salary at retirement do you believe public employee retirees should have to retire with dignity?

            66%-75%

 

2.  Given that most public school employees will not be able to collect Social Security benefits due to the federal law (GPO/WEP), the employees’ retirement income must come from their pension plan and personal income.  Do you believe a defined contribution plan with a 15% of salary contribution will generate a pension that will provide a retirement with dignity?

            No

 

If not, what do you propose to do to provide public employees access to a pension plan that provides a retirement with dignity?

The info we have available and currently being studied – this will most likely define a solution which includes a defined benefit.

 

3.   Would you support returning to a defined benefits retirement plan as a means of attracting and retaining quality educators?

            Yes

 

Rationale

            Answered in previous questions. 

 

4.  According to recent actuarial reports, PERS and TRS have unfunded liabilities.  How do you see the state eliminating these unfunded liabilities to meet their financial obligations to retirees?

We should have used excess revenue this past session to fund the liabilities. We will need to address this ASAP.

 

5.  Will you commit to consulting with NEA-Alaska and other employee organizations whose members are participants in TRS and PERS when changes to the retirement plans are being considered?

            Yes

 

Rationale

My office door is always open – I have worked with all members, officers and worked across party lines to accomplish our goals.

 

ATTRACTING & RETAINING QUALITY EDUCATORS

The #1 factor in student achievement is a quality teacher supported by quality administrators and support staff.  It is well known that Alaska is facing a teacher shortage.  The legislature held several hearings on the matter, but has done little to address the issue.

 

1.  What do you believe are the three essential factors in recruiting and retaining quality teachers?

Compensation

Retirement benefits so we can retain Safe and productive working environment

 

2.  As a legislator, what will you do to address these factors?

Work w/NEA and educate other legislators on issues. I have a proven record of supporting you with my votes.

 

3.   Fiscal uncertainty has caused many “new to the profession” educators to leave Alaskan school districts and even leave the state. According to Commissioner Roger Sampson, the out-of-pocket cost to a school district of losing a teacher is $12,000.  What would you do to eliminate this annual turnover that has cost our state so many valuable educators?

Fix the PERS/TRS issue.

 

4.  Would you work to amend state statute to make sure that district claims of financial shortfalls are verified by independent third parties when dealing with the layoff of tenured teachers?

            Yes

 

Rationale

Common business sense.

         

CLASS SIZE

 

An important factor in student achievement is small class size.  Bills were introduced in the legislature, but little has been done to address the issue.  Would you support a bill that sets recommended class size by grade level and provides for additional funds to schools that meet the standards.

Yes

 

Rationale

Having 4 children graduate from Anchorage School District, being a class mom, always involved in their education, I know this is critical.

 

If yes, would you introduce such a bill and seek co-sponsors?

Yes

 

Rationale

Common sense.

 

 

SAFE SCHOOLS

 

1.   Students and staff must feel safe and secure in our schools for learning to take place.
 Would you support funding for programs/staff that have been demonstrated to increase student and
staff safety?

Yes

 

Rationale

Proven record on voting for issues that protect teachers, administrators and students.

 

2.  A safe learning environment is a key factor in student achievement.  Would you support the use of restraining orders for individuals who threaten or endanger students or public school employees in the public school environment?

Yes

 

3.      Would you support legislation to make a school-related assault on an education employee an

 aggravating factor in sentencing?

Yes

 

HIGH STAKES TESTING

 

1.   For the past three years, some students did not receive diplomas for the sole reason they did not pass the High School Graduation Qualifying Examination (HSGQE.)  Would you support amending the law to allow schools to assess student knowledge and abilities through a variety of means and not just through a single test?

Yes

 

2.   Would you support categorical funding for district-developed remedial programs for students who do not meet standards on Alaska’s benchmark exams?

Yes

 

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT

 

What additional ideas do you have to improve K-12 education in Alaska?

Continue to increase moral for teachers and students by the ways discussed in previous answers.

 

Return to main page