 |
Legislative House Candidate Questionnaire
Campaign 2006
Candidate: Jim Wardman House District: 13
Candidate responses exceeding 30 words have been truncated.
ADEQUATE FUNDING
1. Presently three methods are recognized by experts and the courts as reliable means to determine adequate funding: resource cost, best schools, and professional judgment. Do you support the use of a recognized, research based study to determine the adequate funding level of K-12 schools?
Yes
Explain:
The research should study methods vs. attainment, and funding should be based upon realistic costs of methods and costs of delivery.
If you support an adequate funding study, how would you accomplish this?
Funding should be part of every schools budget and study should be continuing.
2. Do you support the use of area cost differential factors to provide equity in school funding?
Yes
Rationale
I have been to some villages and have seen some of the cost differential and realize the costs for the same results is different by area.
3. The recent changes in funding for pupil transportation have had negative impacts in a number of school districts. How would you address this issue?
Restore funding and make sure contractors are costing services properly.
4. Will you commit to working with NEA-Alaska and other groups in developing a long-range plan to supplement current funding levels and achieve adequate funding for schools within a decade?
Yes
Rationale
Especially K-3, but all grades. Education is fundamental to a sound Alaskan future.
5. Would you support adequate funding of Alaska’s public schools to meet the constitutional mandate prior to funding of any other programs not constitutionally mandated?
Yes
Rationale
It is the resposibility of the legislature to fulfill the constitutional mandates over other matters.
LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PLAN
The 23rd and 24th Legislatures identified several revenue sources for consideration: alcohol tax, cruise ship tax, fuel tax, income tax, sales tax, and use of the Permanent Fund earnings.
Please list, in priority order, the sources you would utilize to create a long-range fiscal plan.
Progressive (not inverted) income tax-citizens should have a stake in it's government.
Resourse duties, more to state advantage than producers.
PERS/TRS
1. What percentage of their salary at retirement do you believe public employee retirees should have to retire with dignity?
66%-75%
2. Given that most public school employees will not be able to collect Social Security benefits due to the federal law (GPO/WEP), the employees’ retirement income must come from their pension plan and personal income. Do you believe a defined contribution plan with a 15% of salary contribution will generate a pension that will provide a retirement with dignity?
No
If not, what do you propose to do to provide public employees access to a pension plan that provides a retirement with dignity?
No, it depends on when started and luck in the market place.
Repeal 141.
3. Would you support returning to a defined benefits retirement plan as a means of attracting and retaining quality educators?
Yes
Rationale
We aren't sure the lack of quality educators will happen, but I agree with reinstating the defined benefir on principle.
4. According to recent actuarial reports, PERS and TRS have unfunded liabilities. How do you see the state eliminating these unfunded liabilities to meet their financial obligations to retirees?
We need to quit ignoring that PERS & TRS a part of the budget and aare unavoidable. A designated bad year for the permanent fund dividend to correct the liability ….
5. Will you commit to consulting with NEA-Alaska and other employee organizations whose members are participants in TRS and PERS when changes to the retirement plans are being considered?
Yes
Rationale
Any legislation that changes the livelihood or work conditions of a group should be discussed with all parties involved.
ATTRACTING & RETAINING QUALITY EDUCATORS
The #1 factor in student achievement is a quality teacher supported by quality administrators and support staff. It is well known that Alaska is facing a teacher shortage. The legislature held several hearings on the matter, but has done little to address the issue.
1. What do you believe are the three essential factors in recruiting and retaining quality teachers?
A) Pay plus differential for high cost areas.
B) Health coverage.
C) Advance educational opportunities, with pay and time.
2. As a legislator, what will you do to address these factors?
Work with NEA to find equitable solutions to all three, and we need to recruit more state students to the education field.
3. Fiscal uncertainty has caused many “new to the profession” educators to leave Alaskan school districts and even leave the state. According to Commissioner Roger Sampson, the out-of-pocket cost to a school district of losing a teacher is $12,000. What would you do to eliminate this annual turnover that has cost our state so many valuable educators?
Not all those leaving the profession are good educators and need to turnover, the rest need to be treated and compensated as the professional they are.
4. Would you work to amend state statute to make sure that district claims of financial shortfalls are verified by independent third parties when dealing with the layoff of tenured teachers?
Yes
Rationale
Funding for non-instructional problems should never affect instructional funding. Instructional funding when budgeted should be fairly consant.
CLASS SIZE
An important factor in student achievement is small class size. Bills were introduced in the legislature, but little has been done to address the issue. Would you support a bill that sets recommended class size by grade level and provides for additional funds to schools that meet the standards.
Yes
Rationale
Especially K-3, and depending on the degree of mainstreaming. Seems like I remember from Ed. Psych. the ideal nember before mainstreaming was 15 students for K-3.
If yes, would you introduce such a bill and seek co-sponsors?
Yes
Rationale
Someone has to stay on it.
SAFE SCHOOLS
1. Students and staff must feel safe and secure in our schools for learning to take place.
Would you support funding for programs/staff that have been demonstrated to increase student and
staff safety?
Yes
Rationale
Children are a most precious commodity.
2. A safe learning environment is a key factor in student achievement. Would you support the use of restraining orders for individuals who threaten or endanger students or public school employees in the public school environment?
Yes
3. Would you support legislation to make a school-related assault on an education employee an aggravating factor in sentencing?
Yes
HIGH STAKES TESTING
1. For the past three years, some students did not receive diplomas for the sole reason they did not pass the High School Graduation Qualifying Examination (HSGQE.) Would you support amending the law to allow schools to assess student knowledge and abilities through a variety of means and not just through a single test?
Yes
2. Would you support categorical funding for district-developed remedial programs for students who do not meet standards on Alaska’s benchmark exams?
Yes
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
What additional ideas do you have to improve K-12 education in Alaska?
None at this time.
