NEA-Alaska Legislative Candidate Questionnaire 

Candidate: George Owletuck

Office: House 6

Candidate responses exceeding 30 words have been truncated.

Adequate Funding

1. Do you support a needs based process for determining the level of school funding?

Yes

Explain:  Needs-based budgeting is us parents and school employees together preparing needs-based budgets.  Our localized assessments address the chronic funding shortfalls.   Over the past 15 years, we have fallen three-quarters of ...

If you support needs based funding, how would you accomplish this?

I support the Education Funding Task Force's A+ Strategy for Year Two Funding recommendation: The Base Student Allocation in the Foundation Formula should increase at least $108 per student plus ...

2.  Do you support a return to the instructional unit approach to funding schools?

Yes

Explain: Because it provides more needed revenue for schools.

3.  The recent changes in funding for pupil transportation have had negative impacts in a number of school districts.  How would you address this issue?

Restore funding.

4.  Will you commit to working with NEA-Alaska and other groups in developing a long-range plan to supplement current funding levels and achieve adequate funding for schools within a decade?

Yes

Attracting & Retaining Quality Educators

1.   Fiscal uncertainty has caused many “new to the profession” educators to leave Alaskan school districts and even leave the state. What would you do to eliminate this annual event that has cost our state so many valuable educators?

Our teacher shortage problem is not a problem of attracting people to Alaska. The problem is really one of retention, of keeping the quality people we already have.   Research at ...

2.  Would you work to amend state statute to make sure that district claims of financial shortfalls are verified by independent third parties when dealing with the layoff of tenured teachers?

Yes

Explain: Because it needs to be verified by an auditor to make sure money is going to the classroom where it can most benefit students of Alaska.

Elementary and Secondary Education Act/No Child Left Behind (ESEA/NCLB)

1.  Would you support categorical funding so educators (teachers and instructional aides) can receive professional development to meet the standards set by ESEA/NCLB?

 

Yes

2.  What amendments to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (No Child Left Behind) do you believe need to be made to make the law workable in Alaska?

Maintain NCLB Act funding to its original authorized funding; if funding is below that level, then restore funding to that level.  Eliminate requirement that all teachers to be “fully qualified”...

3. What are you willing to do in concert with NEA-Alaska and other organizations to amend No Child Left Behind to be “Alaska friendly” and to gain full funding of the Act?

Urge Congress to restore full funding and address Alaska's unique concerns.

High Stake Testing.

1.  This past year, some students did not receive diplomas for the sole reason they did not pass the High School Graduation Qualifying Examination (HSGQE.)  Would you support amending the law to allow schools to assess student knowledge and abilities through a variety of means and not just through a single test?

 

Yes

 

2.  Would you support funding for additional programs/staff to specifically assist students having difficulty passing the HSGQE?

 

Yes

 

3.   Would you support categorical funding for district-developed remedial programs for students who do not meet standards on Alaska’s benchmark exams?

 

Yes

PERS/TRS

1.  Would you support a single tier for each public retirement system as a means of attracting and retaining quality educators?

 

No Response

2.  How would you see the state’s public retirement systems meeting their increasing financial burden?

Alaska must develop its resources, attract and build a US Navy Base in Southeast Alaska, develop world class sea and air ports with rail connections to Mexico to facilitate international ...

Vouchers

1.  Do you support the use of public money for private and religious schools?

 

No

 

2.  Would you support vouchers?

 

No

 

3.  Would you support tuition tax credits

Yes

 

Safe Schools

 

1.  Students and staff must feel safe and secure in our schools for learning to take place.  Would you support funding for programs/staff that have been demonstrated to increase student and staff safety?

 

Yes

Explain: As a father of four daughters, I am quite concerned for school safety. Our school disciplinary and safety program plans must include: standards for student behavior that reflect community standards ...

 

Return to candidate list

 

Note:  ... indicates the response has been truncated.