Home
No Child Left BehindSearch our Site
Historical & legal
perspective
Profiles of plaintiffs
Litigation in other states
Highlights of adequacy study
Voices & issues
Brief primer on funding (PDF)
Web sites for more information
Moore vs. State of Alaska Documents
School Funding Lawsuit -
News Releases & Updates


For immediate release:                         For additional information contact:
June 21, 2007                                        Bill Bjork, President
                                                              Virginia McKinney, Communications Director
                                                              274-0536 (work); 263-8529 (direct);
                                                              229-1803 (cell, occasionally on)

Media Advisory

Who:               Superior Court Judge Sharon Gleason
  
What:               Rules education system violates Constitutional due process rights of
                         some students; upholds constitutionality of school funding; stays
                         decision for a year
                        
When:            
Today
                        

Where:            Superior Court for the State of Alaska, Third Judicial District at
                         Anchorage

Background:   
On August 9, 2004, a coalition of parents, educators, and school
                          districts challenged the constitutionality of Alaska’s funding for
                          kindergarten through high school (K-12) schools.  Moore vs. State
                          of Alaska centers on adequacy-- because the state does not invest
                          enough money in its schools to provide an adequate education for
                          all students.  A month-long trial ended in early November 2006.

 What's next:    We will read and study the 196-page opinion then review our options.   

 Statement by Bill Bjork:  

            “This is a mixed ruling.  We’re pleased that the judge recognized that many of Alaska’s children are not receiving an adequate education.

             “But as far as the funding piece is concerned, this appears to be a disappointing setback.  Frankly, we’re puzzled.               

 “Two decades of flat funding have cut the buying power of our schools almost in half.  Despite the best efforts of teachers and other educators, our schools are failing too many of Alaska’s children.  School districts simply do not have the resources they need to offer every child the opportunity to meet standards—to leave no child behind.   

“To say that money doesn’t matter simply defies logic.” 

###

Superior Court Judge Sharon Gleason expected to rule soon in Moore vs. State of
     Alaska
, landmark school funding lawsuit
(June 11, 2007)

Landmark school funding lawsuit comes to trial (Oct 02, 2006)
School funding lawsuit clears last procedural hurdle  (Jun 15, 2006)
Media Advisory: Oral arguments on standard of review (Mar 14, 2006)
Judge throws out state's motion to dismiss school funding lawsuit: (Sept 6, 2005)
Educators, school districts, parents file landmark lawsuit against the state:
      (Aug 9, 2005